INDEXING YEAR-CLASS STRENGTH OF CRAPPIES USING LARVAL SAMPLING IN TENNESSEE RESERVOIRS
Larval crappies were sampled from three reservoirs (Douglas, Region IV; Percy Priest,
Region II;
Barkley, Region 1) in 1998 and 1999 to determine if year-class strength could be
predicted from
larval densities. All samples were taken by towing a 1 x 2 m neuston net weekly at 14 to
16 sites
per reservoir. All samples were conducted at night except for Barkley Reservoir, where
the same
14 sites were sampled during the day and night to examine diel differences in catch.
Catch of
crappie larvae in neuston samples reflected catch of age-0 crappies collected in fall
trapnetting
samples only in Douglas Reservoir. Lack of a precise measure of year-class strength in
Percy
Priest Reservoir did not allow similar comparisons in that system. However, larval
crappie
catches in 1999 (a dry spring) were half that in 1998 (a wet spring); similar patterns
have been
documented in other Tennessee reservoirs. Catch of crappie larvae was low in both day
and night
samples in Barkley Reservoir in both years, despite high catches of age-0 crappies in
fall trapnets
in 1999. It appears that neuston net sampling, developed on Normandy Reservoir in the
mid-90s,
has application in tributary storage impoundments across the state, and could be a
useful tool for
fisheries managers desiring to index year-class strength of crappies. However, use of
this method
in mainstem impoundments like Barkley Reservoir may be limited.
YEAR-CLASS CONTRIBUTION BY, POST-STOCKING SURVIVAL OF,
AND PREDATION ON STOCKED BLACK-NOSED CRAPPIES
IN TENNESSEE RESERVOIRS
The Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency currently stocks approximately one million
crappies
annually; however, a systematic evaluation of this program has not been conducted. We
assessed
year-class contribution, initial post-stocking mortality, and predation upon recently
stocked
crappies in seven Tennessee impoundments. An oxytetracycline (OTC) marking technique was
used to assess the year-class contribution of stock crappies in three large Tennessee
reservoirs and
one small impoundment. Marking efficacy ranged from 97-100% and marks persisted for at
least
80 weeks. Crappies marked and stocked in Normandy Reservoir during October-December 1997
represented 90% of age-1 fish collected in August 1998 retenone samples and 70% of the
age-2
crappies collected in a 1999 spring electrofishing sample. Initial post-stocking
survival was
assessed by placing fish in net pens for approximately 24 hours. Post-stocking mortality
rates
ranged from 0-95%, averaged 16%, and were most heavily influenced nby loading time and
hauling density. Predation on recently-stocked crappies was evaluated by stomach
analysis of
potentially predacious fish collected by electrofishing 100-m transects proximal to
stocking sites.
Occurrence of stocked crappies in predator stomachs ranged from 14 to 41% among five
systems;
predation rates could be high in systems with high densities of predators such as Woods
Reservoir
and Lake Graham. Stocked BNC were on average 30% smaller than wild age-0 black crappies
and 40% smaller than wild age-0 white crappies collected from eight reservoirs at
roughly the
same time the BNC were stocked, which may increase their risk of predation. Adding to
this risk
is the fact that the fish are often stocked in late fall, which is a time when major
prey species such
as shad are offshore and inshore prey density is low. By changing seasons or life stages
when
crappies are stocked, managers may make this program more widely successful, and benefit
the
crappie fisheries of more reservoirs in Tennessee.
EVALUATION OF THE STATEWIDE 254-MM MINIMUM LENGTH LIMIT ON
CRAPPIES IN TENNESSEE RESERVOIRS
We evaluated the effect of harvest restrictions on the crappie fisheries
in 12 large Tennessee
reservoirs. A Beverton-Holt equilibrium yield model was used to predict and compare the
response of these fisheries to three size restrictions: the current 254-mm total length
limit, a 229-
mm limit and a 178-mm limit (i.e., no size limit). The predicted responses of crappie
fisheries to
size-limits differed among reservoirs and varied with rates of conditional natural
mortality (CM).
In general, Tennessee Reservoirs fell into one of three groups. In the first group
(Normandy,
Woods, Chickamauga, Cherokee, and Douglas Reservoirs), a 254-mm size restriction would
benefit the fishery if CM was low (30%) and may not harm the fishery if CM was close to
40%.
However, at a CM of 50%, yield was adversely impacted by size restrictions, and the
decrease in
number harvested was severe enough to overcome improvements to the size structure of the
population. In the second group (Barkley, Kentucky, J. Percy Priest, Dale Hollow, Watts
Bar,
and Norris Reservoirs), size limits would provide benefits if CM was low (30%). However,
when
CM was higher, decreases in the number harvested under a size restriction would probably
outweigh any benefits gained by improving the size structure of the population. In any
case, a
229-mm size restriction would be better on these lakes than the current 254-mm
restriction. The
last group, consisting only of Tellico Reservoir, showed no benefits to yield or size
structure of
the population under any size restriction at any level of CM. Mean number harvested also
decrease under all size restriction scenarios. In Tellico Reservoir, the fishery would
be best
managed with no size limit.
The main factor affecting the response of crappie populations to size limits was growth.
With the
exception of Cherokee and J. Percy Priest Reservoirs, populations that recruited to the
254-mm
size limit in under three years (Normandy, Woods, Chickamauga, and Douglas Reservoirs)
appeared to benefit from the size limit under low and intermediate levels of CM.
Populations that
recruited to the 254-mm size limit in three or four years (Barkley, Kentucky, Dale
Hollow, Watts
Bar, and Norris Reservoirs) appeared to be better served by the 229-mm limit under low
and
intermediate levels of CM. With the except of Barkley Reservoir, these populations
recruited to
the 229-mm limit in less than three years. In Tellico Reservoir, fish did not recruit to
the 254-mm
size limit until 4.5 years of age, and no size restriction appeared to benefit the
population. The
use of a statewide length limit to regulate crappie harvest assumes that crappie
population
dynamics are similar among the major of regulated waters and that the response of these
fisheries
to such a regulation would be fairly homogenous among systems. Our findings indicate
that site-
specific regulations may provide more effective management strategies. Based on model
results,
the response of Tennessee reservoir crappie fisheries to size and exploitation rates
determined the
exact response of the population to different size restrictions. Accurate estimates of
conditional
natural mortality and exploitation rates for crappies in Tennessee reservoirs are
lacking and are
essential to improve model applicability.
EFFECTS OF HYDROLOGY ON RECRUITMENT OF CRAPPIES
IN TENNESSEE RESERVOIRS
Black crappies and white crappies were sampled to index recruitment in eight reservoirs
(four
mainstems, four tributary storage impoundments) across the state of Tennessee. Crappie
recruitment variation in two reservoirs was estimated from historical catch of age-0
fish in fall
trapnet samples. In the remaining six reservoirs, variation in recruitment was assessed
by
examining residuals generated from catch curves. Mean daily discharge and reservoir
storage
volume values were obtained for each reservoir for three time periods each year:
pre-spawn (1
January to 31 March), spawning (1 April to 31 May) and summer (1 June to 30 September).
A
combined model for three of four tributary storage impoundments revealed a strong
positive
relationship between year-class strength and discharge in the pre-spawn period.
Discharge data
were not available for the fourth tributary impoundment; however, year-class strength
was
negatively related to storage volume of the reservoir in the pre-spawn period. Crappie
recruitment in the four mainstem impoundments was highest at intermediate levels of
discharge,
and a weak inverse relationship existed between crappie recruitment and mean daily
discharge
during the spawning period. No other relations were found between crappie recruitment
and
other hydrological variables in any reservoir. Crappie recruitment was linked to
reservoir
hydrology; however, the critical time and nature of the relationship (positive or
negative) differed
between tributary storage impoundments and mainstem impoundments. Thus, it is likely
that
crappie populations will rarely have strong year classes simultaneously over a wide
geographic
area, or even within a single watershed.
AGE, GROWTH, MORTALITY, AND SPECIES COMPOSITION OF CRAPPIES
POPULATIONS IN TENNESSEE RESERVOIRS,
AND DIFFICULTIES IN SAMPLING THEM
Population characteristics of crappies were examined from twelve
Tennessee reservoirs sampled
either in spring or fall with either trapnets or electrofishing. Total annual mortality
(A) was
estimated in eight of the twelve study reservoirs; high recruitment variability
prevented estimation
of A in four reservoirs. Total annual mortality ranged from 54-75% and averaged 66%.
Total
annual mortality was not correlated to mean length at age-3 among reservoirs sampled in
the fall.
Total annual mortality from age-2 to age-5 for black crappies ranged from 52-79% and
averaged
64%; total annual mortality for white crappies ranged from 35-68% and averaged 54%. The
distributions of lengths at age-3 were variable across reservoirs in terms of range and
skewness,
often encompassing the entire length range seen for the whole sample. Most of the
variability in
growth among reservoirs sampled during the fall was explained by an inverse relationship
with
chlorophyll-a concentrations. Mean relative weights of both species were not related to
mean
length at age-3 in reservoirs sampled during the fall. Species composition varied
greatly among
reservoirs, from systems dominated by black crappies (e.g., Dale Hollow, Cherokee,
Chickamauga) to systems dominated by white crappies (e.g., Tellico, Percy Priest,
Woods).
Based on mean lengths at age-3, black crappies grew slower than white crappies in
Barkley,
Chickamauga, Kentucky, Normandy, and Woods Reservoirs; no significant differences in
growth
between species were detected in Douglas and Watts Bar Reservoirs. The percentage of
black
crappies in each reservoir was negatively correlated with chlorophyll-a
concentrations.
Crappie species compositions in concomitant electrofishing and trapnet samples were
relatively
similar in Kentucky and Barkley Reservoirs. However, in Woods Reservoir black crappies
and
black-nosed crappies represented 63% of the trapnet sample but only 38% of the
electrofishing
sample. Similarly, black crappies represented 81% and 91% of the catch in trapnet
samples from
Normandy Reservoir in 1996 and 1997, respectively, but only 46% and 41% in spring
angling
samples taken concurrently. Species compositions in Normandy electrofishing samples
taken at
roughly the same time of year in subsequent years resembled those of the angling samples
in 1996
and 1997. More white crappies were caught in the headwaters and fewer in the lower
reaches of
Douglas Reservoir; black crappie catch rates were similar among areas. More white
crappies
were caught in the headwater reaches of Kentucky Reservoir than in the middle and lower
reaches. Catch rates of black crappies were higher in the lower and headwater reaches
than in the
middle reach of Kentucky Reservoir. Length-frequencies of crappies collected in
concomitant
electrofishing and trapnet samples in Kentucky and Barkley Reservoirs were distinctly
different;
electrofishing collected larger fish than trapnets in both systems.
We feel that the best sampling regime for assessing crappie populations in Tennessee
reservoirs
would be to use trapnets only to index year-class strength, coupled with concurrent
electrofishing
in the fall to collect larger individuals for age and growth analyses. All mainstem
reservoirs can
be sampled in this way, and some tributary impoundments may also fall into this
category. In
systems where fall larval sampling is ineffective (e.g., most tributary storage
impoundments), we
suggest that larval sampling be used to index year-class strength and spring
electrofishing be used
to obtain age and growth data.
SPATIAL AND DIEL VARIATION IN DISTRIBUTION OF LIMNETIC LARVAE OF
FISHES IN TWO TENNESSEE RESERVOIRS
Larvae were sampled over six years from Normandy Reservoir, a 1,307-ha tributary storage
impoundment and over two years from Barkley Reservoir, a 23,458-ha mainstem impoundment
in
Tennessee. Larvae were collected from 16 sites stratified over 4 areas in Normandy
Reservoir
and 14 sites stratified over embayment and main channel habitats in Barkley Reservoir.
Sites were
sampled both day and night in Barkley Reservoir; sites were sampled only at night in
Normandy
Reservoir. In Barkley Reservoir, suckers and cyprinids were always more abundant in the
main
river channel than in embayments. In contrast, shad Dorosoma spp., sildersides,
longperch
Percina caprodes, and sunfish Lepomis spp. were usually more abundant in embayments.
Larval
fish distribution patterns in Normandy Reservoir were generally more homogenous. Larval
distribution patterns in Barkley Reservoir resembled that of large rivers and were
consistent with
spawning requirements for each group, and were likely a reflection of spawning habitats
used by
adults. Embayments provided important habitats for many fish species at the spawning and
larvae
stages. Main river channel habitats supported fewer species of larvae, but appeared to
be an
important spawning area for native suckers and cyprinids. Catches of larval fish in
Barkely
Reservoir were usually higher at night than during the day for all groups of larval
fish; however,
variation did occur among groups, years and study areas. Stratifying samples among
habitats is
essential to accurately assess larval fish communities in large systems such as Barkley
Reservoir,
but is less important in systems such as Normandy Reservoir, with a more homogenous
distribution of larvae. However, both types of systems should be sampled at night to
maximize
the number of individuals and taxa collected.
AGE, GROWTH, MORTALITY, AND SPECIES COMPOSITION OF
CRAPPIES POPULATIONS IN TENNESSEE RESERVOIRS, AND DIFFICULTIES
SAMPLING THEM.
Population characteristics of crappies were examined from twelve
Tennessee reservoirs sampled
either in spring or fall with either trapnets or electrofishing. Total annual mortality
(A) was
estimated in eight of the twelve study reservoirs; high recruitment variability
prevented estimation
of A in four reservoirs. Total annual mortality ranged from 54-75% and averaged 66%.
Total
annual mortality was not correlated to mean length at age-3 among reservoirs sampled in
the fall.
Total annual mortality from age 2 to age 5 for black crappies ranged from 52-79% and
averaged
64%; total annual mortality for white crappies ranged from 35-68% and averaged 54%. The
distributions of lengths at age-3 were variable across reservoirs in terms of range and
skewness,
often encompassing the entire length range seen for the whole sample. Most of the
variability in
growth among reservoirs sampled during the fall was explained by an inverse relationship
with
chlorophyll-a concentrations. Mean relative weights of both species were not related to
mean
length at age 3 in reservoirs sampled during the fall. Species composition varied
greatly among
reservoirs, from systems dominated by black crappie (e.g., Dall Hollow, Cherokee,
Chickamauga)
to systems dominated by white crappies (e.g., Tellico, Percy Priest, Woods). Based on
mean
lengths at age-3, black crappies grew slower than white crappies in Barkley,
Chickamauga,
Kentucky, Normandy, and Woods Reservoirs; no significant differences in growth between
species were detected in Douglas and Watts Bar Reservoirs. The percentage of black
crappies in
each reservoir was negatively correlated with chlorophyll-a concentrations.
Crappie species compositions in concomitant electrofishing and trapnet samples were
relatively
similar in Kentucky and Barkley Reservoirs. However, in Woods Reservoir black crappies
and
black-nosed crappies represented 63% of the trapnet sample but only 38% of the
electrofishing
sample. Similarly, black crappies represented 81% and 91% of the catch in trapnet
samples from
Normandy Reservoir in 1996 and 1997, respectively, but only 46% and 41% in spring
angling
samples taken concurrently. Species compositions in Normandy electrofishing samples
taken at
roughly the same time of year in subsequent years resembled those of the angling samples
in 1996
and 1997. More white crappies were caught in the headwaters and fewer in the lower
reaches of
Douglas Reservoir; black crappie catch rates were similar among areas. More white
crappies
were caught in the headwater reaches of Kentucky Reservoir than in the middle and lower
reaches. Catch rates of black crappies were higher in the lower and headwater reaches
than in the
middle reach of Kentucky Reservoir. Length-frequencies of crappies collected in
concomitant
electrofishing and trapnet samples in Kentucky and Barkley Reservoirs were distinctly
different;
electrofishing collected larger fish than trapnets in both systems.
We feel that the best sampling regime for assessing crappie populations in Tennessee
reservoirs
would be to use trapnets only to index year-class strength, coupled with concurrent
electrofishing
in the fall to collect larger individuals for age and growth analyses. All mainstem
reservoirs can
be sampled in this way, and some tributary impoundments may also fall into this
category. In
systems where fall sampling is ineffective (e.g., most tributary storage impoundments),
we suggest
that larval sampling be used to index year-class strength and spring electrofishing be
used to
obtain age and growth data. |